Vacant property considered liability by insurance company

As reported earlier, insurance companies view the liability of a residential property that is being rented differently than a property that is occupied by the home owner.  The insurance premium may be 25% or more for a tenant-occupied home.

It gets worse when a property is vacant.  Insurance companies may charge 50-60% more for unoccupied properties compared to a regular policy.  The coverage will likely be limited too and exclude protection against theft, water damage or glass breakage.  Details differ between insurance providers, but their reasoning is the same: if nobody is living in the house or regularly checking the property, the liability for damage is higher.  Especially in areas with severe weather.

Most insurance policies consider a home unoccupied when it has been vacant for 30 days or more, without new residents moving in.   It is critical that employees who leave their homes vacant – either while on assignment  or due to their inability to sell the house after a relocation – check with their insurance provider to arrange adequate coverage.

This entry was posted in Property Management Tagged: , , , | Permalink | Post a comment | Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>